Thanh Hóa
District-level City in Thanh Hóa Province
Contents: Subdivision
The population in Thanh Hóa as well as related information and services (Wikipedia, Google, images).
icon links to further information about a selected division including its population structure (age groups).| Name | Status | Population Census 2009-04-01 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thanh Hóa | District-level City | 322,543 | |
| An Hoạch (Nhồi) | Ward | 6,285 | → |
| Ba Đình | Ward | 10,108 | → |
| Điện Biên | Ward | 7,391 | → |
| Đông Cương | Ward | 10,592 | → |
| Đông Hải | Ward | 8,754 | → |
| Đông Hưng | Rural Commune | 4,147 | → |
| Đông Hương | Ward | 12,155 | → |
| Đông Lĩnh | Rural Commune | 7,635 | → |
| Đông Sơn | Ward | 13,978 | → |
| Đông Tân | Rural Commune | 7,051 | → |
| Đông Thọ | Ward | 21,445 | → |
| Đông Vệ | Ward | 21,668 | → |
| Đông Vinh | Rural Commune | 3,371 | → |
| Hàm Rồng | Ward | 5,262 | → |
| Hoằng Anh | Rural Commune | 3,692 | → |
| Hoằng Đại | Rural Commune | 3,787 | → |
| Hoằng Long | Rural Commune | 2,871 | → |
| Hoằng Lý | Rural Commune | 3,021 | → |
| Hoằng Quang | Rural Commune | 6,166 | → |
| Lam Sơn | Ward | 10,201 | → |
| Nam Ngạn | Ward | 11,385 | → |
| Ngọc Trạo | Ward | 10,960 | → |
| Phú Sơn | Ward | 10,716 | → |
| Quảng Cát | Rural Commune | 7,967 | → |
| Quảng Đông | Rural Commune | 5,067 | → |
| Quảng Hưng | Ward | 9,701 | → |
| Quảng Phú | Rural Commune | 6,977 | → |
| Quảng Tâm | Rural Commune | 9,518 | → |
| Quảng Thắng | Ward | 7,768 | → |
| Quảng Thành | Ward | 11,169 | → |
| Quảng Thịnh | Rural Commune | 7,850 | → |
| Tân Sơn | Ward | 11,333 | → |
| Tào Xuyên | Ward | 5,400 | → |
| Thiệu Dương | Rural Commune | 9,838 | → |
| Thiệu Khánh | Rural Commune | 9,039 | → |
| Thiệu Vân | Rural Commune | 5,163 | → |
| Trường Thi | Ward | 13,112 | → |
| Thanh Hóa | Province | 3,400,595 |
Source: General Statistics Office of Vietnam (web).
Explanation: Communes as defined in 2009 and districts follow the definiton of 2018. The computation of boundaries and population figures for districts is based on the tabulated communes of 2009. Thus, slight discrepancies to the actual situation are possible in few cases. Area figures are derived from geospatial data.