Quỳnh Lưu
District in Nghệ An Province
Contents: Subdivision
The population in Quỳnh Lưu as well as related information and services (Wikipedia, Google, images).
icon links to further information about a selected division including its population structure (age groups).| Name | Status | Population Census 2009-04-01 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quỳnh Lưu | District | 251,693 | |
| An Hòa | Rural Commune | 9,573 | → |
| Cầu Giát | Township | 5,532 | → |
| Ngọc Sơn | Rural Commune | 7,292 | → |
| Quỳnh Bá | Rural Commune | 4,516 | → |
| Quỳnh Bảng | Rural Commune | 11,007 | → |
| Quỳnh Châu | Rural Commune | 11,096 | → |
| Quỳnh Diện | Rural Commune | 5,552 | → |
| Quỳnh Đôi | Rural Commune | 4,204 | → |
| Quỳnh Giang | Rural Commune | 9,008 | → |
| Quỳnh Hậu | Rural Commune | 7,090 | → |
| Quỳnh Hoa | Rural Commune | 4,616 | → |
| Quỳnh Hồng | Rural Commune | 6,959 | → |
| Quỳnh Hưng | Rural Commune | 7,952 | → |
| Quỳnh Lâm | Rural Commune | 11,701 | → |
| Quỳnh Long | Rural Commune | 8,429 | → |
| Quỳnh Lương | Rural Commune | 6,151 | → |
| Quỳnh Minh | Rural Commune | 4,499 | → |
| Quỳnh Mỹ | Rural Commune | 7,006 | → |
| Quỳnh Nghĩa | Rural Commune | 7,461 | → |
| Quỳnh Ngọc | Rural Commune | 4,821 | → |
| Quỳnh Tam | Rural Commune | 7,760 | → |
| Quỳnh Tân | Rural Commune | 10,932 | → |
| Quỳnh Thạch | Rural Commune | 7,716 | → |
| Quỳnh Thắng | Rural Commune | 8,724 | → |
| Quỳnh Thanh | Rural Commune | 10,909 | → |
| Quỳnh Thọ | Rural Commune | 5,271 | → |
| Quỳnh Thuận | Rural Commune | 5,263 | → |
| Quỳnh Văn | Rural Commune | 12,122 | → |
| Quỳnh Yên | Rural Commune | 7,285 | → |
| Sơn Hải | Rural Commune | 11,538 | → |
| Tân Sơn | Rural Commune | 7,931 | → |
| Tân Thắng | Rural Commune | 3,387 | → |
| Tiến Thủy | Rural Commune | 8,390 | → |
| Nghệ An | Province | 2,912,041 |
Source: General Statistics Office of Vietnam (web).
Explanation: Communes as defined in 2009 and districts follow the definiton of 2018. The computation of boundaries and population figures for districts is based on the tabulated communes of 2009. Thus, slight discrepancies to the actual situation are possible in few cases. Area figures are derived from geospatial data.