Cochinoca
Department in Jujuy
Department
The population development of Cochinoca.
| Name | Status | Population Census 1991-05-15 | Population Census 2001-11-17 | Population Census 2010-10-27 | Population Census 2022-05-18 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cochinoca | Department | 9,859 | 12,111 | 12,656 | 15,054 | → |
| Jujuy | Province | 512,329 | 611,888 | 673,307 | 811,611 |
Contents: Localities
The population development of the localities in Cochinoca.
| Name | Status | Department | Population Census 1991-05-15 | Population Census 2001-11-17 | Population Census 2010-10-27 | Population Census 2022-05-18 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdón Castro Tolay | Locality | Cochinoca | 199 | 229 | 279 | 277 | → |
| Abralaite | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | 53 | 56 | 50 | → |
| Abra Pampa | Locality | Cochinoca | 5,398 | 7,496 | 8,705 | 10,899 | → |
| Agua de Castilla | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | ... | 96 | 85 | → |
| Casabindo | Locality | Cochinoca | 95 | 155 | 118 | 143 | → |
| Cochinoca | Locality | Cochinoca | 85 | 75 | 67 | 99 | → |
| La Redonda | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | ... | 45 | 42 | → |
| Puesto del Marquéz | Locality | Cochinoca | 197 | 299 | 255 | 328 | → |
| Quebraleña | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | ... | 53 | 97 | → |
| Quera | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | ... | 34 | 46 | → |
| Rachaite | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | ... | ... | 49 | → |
| Rinconadillas | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | 189 | 189 | 155 | → |
| San Francisco de Alfarcito | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | 57 | 169 | 96 | → |
| Santa Ana de la Puna | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | ... | 41 | 34 | → |
| Santuario de Tres Pozos | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | 164 | 152 | 335 | → |
| Sauzalito | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | ... | ... | 55 | → |
| Tambillos | Locality | Cochinoca | ... | ... | 122 | 22 | → |
| Tusaquillas | Locality | Cochinoca | 65 | 93 | 134 | 117 | → |
Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos de la Republica Argentina.
Explanation: The 2022 census figures for localities refer to the population in private households, i.e., they exclude institutional population and homeless people.